Experimental measurements of the effects of surface roughness on large-scale downburst-like impinging jets at the WindEEE Dome laboratory (Q9989)

Thunderstorm downbursts originate as negatively buoyant currents of cold air descending from cumulonimbus clouds. Upon impacting the ground, a strong radial outflow develops with maximum wind velocities occurring at the near-ground level. These types of flows pose serious hazard to the natural and built environment. Their restricted time and spatial extent as well as their intermittent and non-Gaussian fluctuating nature make them extremely challenging to be recorded and analyzed through classic full-scale measurements in nature. Alongside synoptic-scale extra tropical cyclones, downbursts govern the wind climate at the mid-latitude areas around the globe. Recent trends in climate change studies suggest both an increased intensity as well as frequency of occurrence of these events. Therefore, their scientific comprehension urges serious consideration. In the context of the project THUNDERR Detection, simulation, modelling and loading of thunderstorm outflows to design wind-safer and cost-efficient structures, financed by the European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant 2016 (grant No. 741273, P.I. Prof. Giovanni Solari, University of Genoa), an extensive experimental campaign was recently conducted at the WindEEE Dome wind chamber. This campaign focused on measuring downburst-like flows (DLFs) generated by large-scale impinging jets. The dataset presented here encompasses a portion of the measurements collected during this comprehensive experimental initiative. Specifically, this series of tests aimed to unravel the role of surface roughness in potentially altering the configuration and dynamics of the overall radial outflow. The term "surface roughness" pertains to the ground patch under examination, encompassing both the natural features of the terrain and any obstacles, such as buildings, present on the ground. While surface roughness plays a decisive role in changing the shape and magnitudes of the wind speed vertical profiles for extra-tropical cyclones, the scientific literature has not yet thoroughly addressed its impact on downburst winds, which are different being dominated by intense vortex dynamics. Impinging jets, considered representative for the simulation of downburst like flow (DLF), are here simulated as transient phenomena through the opening and closing of the bell-mouth that connects the test chamber and the upper plenum of the dome, the latter being pressurized before releasing the jet. As a result, the velocity records exhibit a distinct pattern, featuring a sudden ramp-up of velocity, followed by a velocity peak, a statistically-stationary phase, and ultimately, a gradual velocity decelerationmirroring the behavior observed in real-world scenarios. The database consists of six ASCII tab-delimited text files, denoted as windspeedDB89z0eq007.txt, windspeedDB89z0eq020.txt, windspeedDB89z0eq320.txt, windspeedDB124z0eq007.txt, windspeedDB124z0eq020.txt, and windspeedDB124z0eq320.txt, aligning with the two jet intensities and three rough surfaces employed in the experiments. These filenames correspond to: (i) centerline jet velocities at the nozzle outlet section, with values of Wjet = 8.9 and 12.4 m/s (indicated as Wjet in the database files); (ii) equivalent full-scale roughness lengths z0eq = 0.007, 0.020, 0.32 m (z0eq in the database files, see details below). Each file encompasses wind speed timeseries, detailed as follows: The three-component velocity measurements were recorded by means of 11 Cobra probes (sampling frequency 2,500 Hz) mounted on a stiff mast. The heights (z) of the probes were z = 0.040, 0.070, 0.100, 0.125, 0.150, 0.200, 0.300, 0.400, 0.500, 0.700, 1.000 m above the surface. Within the database files, the wind speed linked to various heights is labeled as v_zXXXXmm. In this notation, 'v' designates the velocity component: longitudinal U (along the horizontal axis of the probe), corresponding to the radial outflow of the downburst, with a positive value when the flow is directed toward the probe. Transversal, V, represents the velocity component transverse to the probe's centerline axis, having a positive value when the flow is directed right-to-left concerning an observer facing the probe's head. The vertical component is denoted as W with a positive value indicating an upward direction. The term XXXX signifies the height of the probe, specified in millimeters (mm). The mast with the Cobra probes was subsequently positioned at ten radial r distances with respect to the jet impingement position in the range r/D (D = 3.2 m is the jet diameter) between 0.22.0 with an increment of 0.2. Note that the position r/D = 0.8 was adjusted to r/D = 0.75. This modification was necessary due to irregularities on the chamber floor at r/D = 0.8, which could have otherwise introduced bias into the measurements. The radial distance is identified with r/D_distance in the dataset files. The ceiling height of the testing chamber is H = 3.75 m, which leads to H/D 1 allowing for a full vertical development of the downburst radial outflow. For every r/D position, each experiment with the same initial condition (i.e., Wjet) was repeated 10 times (repetition# in the database files) to inspect the repeatability of the tests and their variance. Each velocity record lasted 12 s (12 2,500 = 30,000 samples) and the duration of the downburst-like part of the record varied between 35 s. Overall, 6,600 total time series (2 Wjet 3 rough surface 10 repetitions 10 r/D positions 11 heights z) of downburst-like outflows were recorded during this set of experimental tests. The reported accuracy of Cobra probes from the manufacturer is +/- 0.5 m/s and +/- 1 for velocity and yaw/pitch angles respectively, up to approximately 30% of turbulence intensity. All velocity magnitudes below 1 m/s were removed and converted to NaN (Not a Number) in the database due to the poor accuracy of Cobra probes for velocities below this threshold. In addition, some velocity values were reported as null in the instrument readings due to the incoming flow being outside the probe's spatial cone of measurement (+/- 45 in respect to the probe horizontal axis). These values are flagged as NULL values in the database. This notation aligns with that utilized in a preceding database of measurements collected within the same experimental campaign at the WindEEE Dome (Canepa et al., 2021; https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.931205). DLFs were tested on three different surfaces: (i) WindEEE Dome bare floor; (ii) Carpet; (iii) Artificial grass. A 1 m 8 m rectangular section was selected from each of the three surfaces for testing purposes. Each surface was positioned with a 1 m offset relative to the geometric location of the jet impingement. It was identified by an equivalent full-scale roughness length, z0eqbased on matching atmospheric boundary layer profiles measured in WindEEE in boundary layer mode with standard ESDU (Engineering Science Data Unit) profiles. A total of 15 different Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL)-like profiles were tested inside the chamber by varying the rotation-per-minute (rpm) of the fans across the 4 rows of the 60-fan walla peripheral wall of the hexagonal WindEEE Dome chamber comprising a matrix of 4 15 (rows columns) fans that is used to produce ABL -like flows. A specific configuration of the 60-fan wall and a length scale of 1:200 were chosen based on correlation analysis between physically reproduced ABL profiles and curve fitting through Eq. A1.8 of the ESDU 82026. This scale is deemed suitable for both ABL and downburst winds produced at the laboratory. Through a linear fitting of the measured data on the U ln(z) chart, employing the logarithmic law-of-the-wall (dependent on roughness length z0 and friction velocity u*), the equivalent roughness lengths for the three surfaces were determined: z0eq = 0.007, 0.020, 0.320 m for the WindEEE Dome bare floor, carpet, and artificial grass, respectively. In summary, each experimental velocity time series consists of 30,000 rows, with 33 columns detailing the three velocity components (U, V, W) across the 11 Cobra probe heights. Columns 34 to 37 provide information on the repetition number, radial position of measurement, equivalent full-scale roughness length, and jet intensity. The subsequent timeseries within the dataset refer to the parameters in columns 34 to 37, each one spanning its entire range in the specified order. Researchers can leverage this database to validate and calibrate numerical and analytical models of thunderstorm winds, in addition to interpreting full-scale measurements of the phenomenon. It also serves as a valuable resource for the fluid dynamics community, particularly those interested in the physical comprehension of downscaled flows or the surface flow dynamics of large Reynolds number impinging jets.